Thursday, March 15, 2012

It's Official: Men Simply Cannot Think Properly When a Pretty Girl is Around

During an experiment, the psychological performance of a man was impaired after simply being told he would be observed by a woman

Article: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-interacting-with-woman-leave-man-cognitively-impaired

Image: Google Images

This article describes studies which show that men become cognitively impaired after interacting with an attractive woman or simply by anticipating an interaction with a woman they do not know. Experiments performed at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands used male and female university students as participants to study the psychological effect of women on men. Each student’s cognitive performance was tested using a Stroop test, which involves a list of colors written in a different colored ink. The ability to process competing information can be determined according to how quickly a person can name the color of the ink the word is written in, ignoring the actual word. Participants were then asked to read in front of a camera, supposedly as a “lip reading task” which would be watched by an observer on the other end of the webcam. Participants were told the observer’s name (obviously male or female), but no other information about the person watching them. Afterwards, the students took another Stroop test. The women did not perform any differently. Neither did men who thought a man was observing. However, men who thought a woman was observing them did worse on the second test. In another experiment, the researchers had participants do the same tasks, but rather than having them perform the “lip reading,” they simply made the participants think they were going to and then administered the Stroop test. Again, women and men who thought they were going to be observed by a man did not change. But men who were told a woman would be observing, even though there was never any observation, still did worse the second time. Not only did the men not have to physically interact with a woman, but they also only had to think about an interaction with women to become cognitively impaired. The researchers believe this phenomenon may have something to do with men being more aware of possible mating opportunities and therefore concentrating more on whether or not the woman might be a potential date. There is also more social pressure on men to be impressive in front of the opposite sex. We use a lot of mental energy thinking about how others may interpret what we say and how we act. So when men are too concerned about what a woman may think of him, he is more likely to become cognitively impaired.

Movies and TV shows love to portray men acting like fools in front of pretty girls, but there is never an explanation for this behavior other than their brains being turned to mush. This study offers that much needed explanation. This research provides a better understanding of the way we think and act during social interactions. As technology advances, we rely more on interactions via the internet, such as online dating. This study proves that these interactions cause the same psychological impairments as face-to-face encounters. When a man worries about what a women might think of him, whether she be there in person or simply chatting with him online, he cannot think as clearly. This may have been generally accepted before, but now there is proof.

As a sociology minor, I am interested in how people interact with one another. I find this study and its findings absolutely fascinating. I am from a family full of boys and am constantly amazed by both our similarities and our differences. This particular difference has rather humorous effects at times, as seen on tv. I guess I will have to be more forgiving from now on towards members of the male gender who forget how to think properly around me or my female friends.

The Search for Creativity

While trying to find the source of creativity in the brain, researchers from USC have discovered that the left hemisphere has a more critical role in creative thinking than previously thought

Article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120305132438.htm

Image: Google Images

Until recently, creativity was thought to reside in the right side of the brain while the left side dealt more with reason and logic. However, Aziz-Zadeh’s research group conducted a study which found that while the right does most of the creative work, it gets some help from the other half. This group studied the way in which the brain does visual creative tasks. Their findings are supported by previous studies on musical improv and the brain. Both hemispheres are needed to complete creative tasks. The research team used fMRIs to scan brains of visually creative architecture students as they completed spatial processing and creative tasks. During the creative task, the left hemisphere lit up more than during the noncreative task. The right brain did most of the work, but the left brain provided vital support. This team plans to continue its research, looking at how the brain handles different types of creativity, comparing and contrasting each.

Science is continually unveiling more and more about how the human body, especially the brain, works. While much remains a mystery to us, we are constantly searching for more information about ourselves. This study helps us grasp a more complete understanding of where are creativity comes from and how our brain works to create wonderful works of art. The more we know about ourselves, the more we can understand about each other. Studies such as this get us closer to knowing how we function and what makes us think and act the way we do.

I find all studies about the brain fascinating. It is such a complex organ and we still have so much to learn. We are constantly looking for new discoveries in the depths of the ocean and outer space, but as we look so far outside ourselves, our own bodies remain a mystery. Biology was never my favorite subject in school. I often got bored labeling diagrams of frogs and learning about the detailed workings of cells. However, the brain has always intrigued me. Each new piece of information uncovers more unanswered questions. While I rely heavily on logic during my every day live, I also consider myself a pretty creative person. This study allows me to see how the two sides of my brain work together to allow me to create art, or something close to it.

Computer Software Responds to Students’ Cognitive and Emotional States

A team of researchers recently developed computer software which can sense emotions such as boredom and frustration in the students they tutor



Article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120302132546.htm

Image: Google Images

“AutoTutor” and “Affective AutoTutor” are capable of asking probing questions to discover a student’s level of knowledge, analysis, correcting misconceptions, responding to student’s questions, complaints, and comments, and sensing emotions through facial expression and posture. After sensing emotions of frustration or boredom, the computer adjusts its strategies. Through these programs, computers are moving away from their usual forms of communication and towards more human methods of interaction. This is a big step in human-computer interaction. This new technology is able to discover information about a user’s cognitive state, motivation level, and social dynamics. AutoTutor aids students through conversing with them in natural language, simulating human teaching methods and motivational tactics, tailoring interactions to individuals, and keeping students engaged, among other methods. This technology is meant to simulate the best of human tutors, teaching students while keeping them engaged. The one-on-one experience of tutoring is more effective than classroom settings. AutoTutor has helped students gain a letter grade, performing better than beginner human tutors and almost as well as excellent human tutors.

The development of this new software shows great improvements in the field of human-computer interaction and artificial intelligence. Previously, it was impossible to communicate with a computer the way we would communicate with other people. However, this new development opens up opportunities not only for teaching, but also human interaction with technology. We continue to search for ways to make our lives easier. This tutoring software gives students the opportunity to learn through a system which tailors itself to fit the needs of the individual. It gives students the time and attention they may not get in the classroom.

While I found this article very interesting, I can’t help but feel a bit wary about this new technology. I don’t exactly fit in with the rest of my generation in our love of technology. I am not the most computer literate and do not obsess over iphones and other cool gadgets. I’m much more of a people person. Therefore, this new software does not sound like the greatest thing to me. I find the steps we’ve made in technological advances astounding and am quite impressed by a computer which can hold a conversation and sense boredom. But I’m not gonna lie, it freaks me out. I’m one of those weirdos who hears about software like this and thinks we should be careful or we might end up in a sci-fi movie. I don’t like the idea of technology taking over the role of humans (first stop tutoring, next stop the world!). In my opinion, human interaction should remain in the realm of humans. Computers do enough, however weird that statement makes me.